This girl Henry saw's name was Ann Boleyn. She was a vivacious girl who liked to flaunt what she had to the men and act a little promiscuous. Henry wanted Ann to be his mistress, but Ann refused man times. She wanted to be queen or nothing with him. Eventually it became too much for Henry to take, and he wanted a divorce so that he could marry Ann and have an heir instead of the children dying every time. However, the pope would not allow him to do such a thing, Henry sought to make himself leader of the Church of England, and succeeded.
However, Henry soon grew tired of Ann, and took a fancy for one of her ladies in waiting. Her name was Jane Seymour, and she was almost the exact opposite of Ann. Jane was quiet, prim, and listened and obeyed commands, unlike Ann, who had her own way of doing things. Another reason Henry wanted to get rid of Ann was that she had not produced a son for him, which they had fought about several times, but was becoming old. So to get Ann out of his hair, Henry charged her with committing adultery and treason, and later on was beheaded.
It seems that yes, King Henry VIII was justified in divorcing Catherine of Aragon. The yearn for a male heir was fervent back then, because of the men being more powerful in the world of government and politics. Because Catherine could not produce, it would only seem logical for Henry to divorce her, because he wanted a male heir, which is completely understandable, since she could not produce a child, male or female for him. It would also be logical for him to make himself the head of the Church of England, since the pope would not annul the marriage. So yes, both issues were logical and justified in a sense.
Lack of in-text citations doesn't help your argument at all. Nor does the fact that all of your evidence seems completely generalized and your thesis statement isn't where it should be in an academic paper.
ReplyDeleteC-